UCSD Moores EAB: A leak to The Cancer Letter derailed the iterative process

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Dear Editor, 

The UCSD Moores Cancer Center External Advisory Board is extremely disappointed in the commentary included in the most recent issue of The Cancer Letter regarding MCC (The Cancer Letter, June 2, 2023).

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
EAB members, UCSD Moores Cancer Center
EAB members, UCSD Moores Cancer Center
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Positive topline results have come out of the randomized phase II FOURLIGHT-1 study evaluating atirmociclib in combination with fulvestrant, versus fulvestrant or everolimus plus exemestane, in people with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor-based treatment. 
The phase III persevERA Breast Cancer study, evaluating investigational giredestrant in combination with palbociclib for people with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, did not meet its primary objective of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population versus letrozole plus palbociclib, but a numerical improvement was observed. 
EAB members, UCSD Moores Cancer Center
EAB members, UCSD Moores Cancer Center

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login