The Cancer Letter

The leading source for information on the issues that shape oncology since 1973

In Brief

NCCN begins work on guidelines to improve cancer care in the Caribbean

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print
BYLINE
IN THIS ISSUE
DOWNLOAD PDFTABLE OF CONTENTS

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the Caribbean Association for Oncology & Hematology are collaborating to develop a library of NCCN Harmonized Guidelines for the Caribbean during the CAOH Conference—Oncology.

Robert Carlson, chief executive officer of NCCN was joined at the CAOH conference by Joan McClure, senior vice president, clinical information and publications, NCCN; Ben Anderson, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Al Benson, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Natalie Callander, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center; Wui-Jin Koh, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; James Mohler, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center; and Douglas Wood, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.

They participated in a working session with local oncologists to adapt existing NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology and NCCN Framework for Resource Stratification of NCCN Guidelines in order to better reflect the diverse needs and resources throughout the Caribbean.

The Clinical Team was led by Kavi Capildeo, Trinidad and Tobago; Sophia Edwards-Bennett, Jamaica; Owen Gabriel, St. Lucia; Theresa Laurent, Oncology/Haematology, Barbados; Dylan Narinesingh; and Gilian Wharfe, The University of the West Indies, Jamaica.

The NCCN Harmonized Guidelines for the Caribbean will initially cover the following cancer types:

  • Breast Cancer

  • Cervical Cancer

  • Colon Cancer & Colon Cancer Screening

  • Multiple Myeloma

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Prostate Cancer

  • Rectal Cancer

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

News Analysis

GRAIL presses on with Galleri test despite missed primary endpoint in pivotal study
Where GRAIL sees signals of benefit in the subgroups, screening experts see signs of overdiagnosis

If you listen to GRAIL executives discuss the results of the long-awaited trial of the company’s multicancer detection test, you might be led to conclude that the company’s pivotal NHS-Galleri study had an overwhelmingly positive result.
By Jacquelyn Cobb and Sara Willa Ernst
Conversation with The Cancer Letter

GRAIL’s Megan Hall: “I think we can be confident that there is clinical benefit to implementing this technology. And I think that’s really hard to argue with.”
Mainstream epidemiologists beg to differ

Undeterred by the negative topline result of its pivotal trial of Galleri, a multicancer detection test, the test’s sponsor, GRAIL, said it’s forging ahead with its plan to get FDA approval and reimbursement from CMS and private insurers.
By Jacquelyn Cobb and Sara Willa Ernst
Conversation with The Cancer Letter

NCI’s Philip Castle on NHS-Galleri results: “I’m sorry that it didn’t work, but it keeps the national conversation going.”
Castle is “disappointed” by Galleri results but not discouraged by implications for MCDs

Philip E. Castle, director of the NCI Division of Cancer Prevention, said he was disappointed to hear that GRAIL’s NHS-Galleri trial did not meet its primary endpoint of reduction in late-stage cancers.
By Jacquelyn Cobb and Sara Willa Ernst
Table of Contents

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login

Site license subscribers:
Log in with your IP | Register a sponsored account