ASCO issues position statement on drug prices

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The American Society of Clinical Oncology issued a position statement on pricing of cancer drugs.

The statement asserts that any solutions must preserve patients’ access to care and foster innovation, analyzes a wide array of options and recommends that a panel of stakeholders be established to determine which proposals will be effective and develop a uniform approach for assessing the value of drugs.

Developed by ASCO volunteer leaders and adopted by the society’s board of directors, the ASCO Position Statement On Addressing the Affordability of Cancer Drugs analyzes a range of cost-cutting proposals, from allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, to legalizing the importation of drugs, to adopting bundled payment programs.

Specifically, ASCO proposes that a diverse group of stakeholders from across the healthcare sector:

  • Identify, prioritize, and test potential solutions to address the affordability of cancer drugs

  • Help define a standard approach to assessing the value of drugs that could be applied broadly to inform drug pricing and reimbursement.

While new classes of drugs have achieved unprecedented success in a growing number of cancers, in some cases the price of a new drug bears no relation to its effectiveness. According to one study, only 19 percent of cancer drugs recently approved by the FDA produced clinically meaningful outcomes for patients, despite their high prices.

ASCO suggests that:

  • The FDA consider using meaningful clinical outcomes when assessing new and supplemental drug applications, rather than small benefits that achieve statistical significance in large trials. In 2014, ASCO published a policy statement recommending a definition of clinically meaningful outcomes for cancer clinical trials, which the FDA could use when approving new cancer treatments and drug indications.

  • Medicare test the feasibility of a “value-based pathway” approach designed to incentivize providers to use higher-value drugs and the pharmaceutical industry to develop high-value treatments.

The full text of ASCO’s position statement is posted here.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Thomas J. Lynch Jr. and Howard A. “Skip” Burris III lead two institutions that couldn’t be more different—an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center on one side of the country and a for-profit research enterprise on the other—but they stay up at nights worrying about the same thing.
In back-to-back congressional hearings earlier this week, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that the massive staff and budget cuts over which he has presided during his nearly four months on the job as well as even bigger cuts still looming on the horizon are a part of a single plan.
Natalie Phelps, a 43-year-old mother of two, has stage 4 colorectal cancer. She has become a central figure in the controversy over the dysfunction the Trump administration’s RIFs and budget cuts have brought to NIH. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login