ASCO issues position statement on drug prices

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The American Society of Clinical Oncology issued a position statement on pricing of cancer drugs.

The statement asserts that any solutions must preserve patients’ access to care and foster innovation, analyzes a wide array of options and recommends that a panel of stakeholders be established to determine which proposals will be effective and develop a uniform approach for assessing the value of drugs.

Developed by ASCO volunteer leaders and adopted by the society’s board of directors, the ASCO Position Statement On Addressing the Affordability of Cancer Drugs analyzes a range of cost-cutting proposals, from allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, to legalizing the importation of drugs, to adopting bundled payment programs.

Specifically, ASCO proposes that a diverse group of stakeholders from across the healthcare sector:

  • Identify, prioritize, and test potential solutions to address the affordability of cancer drugs

  • Help define a standard approach to assessing the value of drugs that could be applied broadly to inform drug pricing and reimbursement.

While new classes of drugs have achieved unprecedented success in a growing number of cancers, in some cases the price of a new drug bears no relation to its effectiveness. According to one study, only 19 percent of cancer drugs recently approved by the FDA produced clinically meaningful outcomes for patients, despite their high prices.

ASCO suggests that:

  • The FDA consider using meaningful clinical outcomes when assessing new and supplemental drug applications, rather than small benefits that achieve statistical significance in large trials. In 2014, ASCO published a policy statement recommending a definition of clinically meaningful outcomes for cancer clinical trials, which the FDA could use when approving new cancer treatments and drug indications.

  • Medicare test the feasibility of a “value-based pathway” approach designed to incentivize providers to use higher-value drugs and the pharmaceutical industry to develop high-value treatments.

The full text of ASCO’s position statement is posted here.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

At the Sept. 4 meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, NCI Principal Deputy Director Douglas R. Lowy provided an overview of how NCI is weathering the maelstrom of executive orders, policy changes, and funding uncertainties that has come down on federal agencies and research institutes since Donald Trump’s inauguration in January. 
A Senate hearing that the administration hoped would be a routine check-in on the president’s 2026 MAHA-driven healthcare agenda erupted into a political firestorm as senators jumped at their first opportunity to confront HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over the chaos engulfing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In December 1971, President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act and declared a “War on Cancer.” In the past 54 years, the U.S. has invested $180 billion nominally, or approximately $322 billion when adjusted for inflation, in cancer research. This investment has paid dividends with more than 100 anticancer drugs brought to market in half a century—virtually all traceable to National Cancer Institute funding. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login