Study determines factors affecting decisions regarding active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A study examined the rates of active surveillance use and evaluated the factors associated with selecting this management strategy over surgery or radiation in low-risk prostate cancer, with a focus on underserved Black patients who have been underrepresented in prior studies. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier predicts which patients with metastatic cancer are likely to benefit from treatment intensification with the chemotherapy docetaxel and which are not likely to benefit and can therefore avoid unnecessary toxicity, according to findings by University College London and Veracyte, Inc., a genomic diagnostic company. 
Pfizer Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc. announced positive topline results from the overall survival analysis from the phase III EMBARK study evaluating Xtandi (enzalutamide), an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, in combination with leuprolide, and as a monotherapy in men with non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence at high risk for metastasis.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login