Study determines factors affecting decisions regarding active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A study examined the rates of active surveillance use and evaluated the factors associated with selecting this management strategy over surgery or radiation in low-risk prostate cancer, with a focus on underserved Black patients who have been underrepresented in prior studies. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In the evolving landscape of pediatric oncology, survivorship research has become an essential component of our mission to improve long-term patient outcomes. At City of Hope, we are focused on not only curing childhood cancers but also ensuring that survivors live the healthiest lives possible. A significant part of my research has been dedicated to mitigating the long-term toxicities of cancer therapy—particularly cardiovascular complications that can arise decades after treatment.
Pfizer Inc. announced positive results from the phase III TALAPRO-2 study of Talzenna (talazoparib), an oral poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor, in combination with Xtandi (enzalutamide), an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, demonstrating a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared to placebo plus Xtandi in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, with or without homologous recombination repair gene mutations.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login