Neratinib in HER2-positive HR-negative early stage breast cancer shows DFS benefit vs. placebo

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Nerlynx (neratinib) demonstrates a 5.1% invasive disease-free survival benefit versus placebo in the phase III ExteNET trial evaluating Nerlynx in HER2-positive, hormone receptor-positive early stage breast cancer.

Nerlynx is sponsored by Pierre Fabre. Results from the trial were published in Clinical Breast Cancer.

In the HR+ /< 1 yr patient population, the absolute 5-year invasive disease-free survival benefit versus placebo was 5.1% and absolute 8-year overall survival benefit was 2.1%. The 5-year cumulative incidence of Central Nervous System metastases was 0.7% in the neratinib arm and 2.1% in the placebo arm.

In the HR+/ <1 yr, subgroup of patients who did not achieve pCR upon neo-adjuvant treatment, and hence were at a high risk of disease recurrence, the absolute 5-year iDFS benefit in the neratinib arm versus placebo was 7.4% (HR=0.60; 95% CI 0.33???1.07) and the 8- year overall survival benefit was 9.1% (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.23- 0.92).

The primary endpoint of the trial was invasive disease-free survival, with overall survival as a key secondary endpoint. Within the European Union, Nerlynx is approved in adult patients with HER2+/HR+ early breast cancer who initiated treatment within one year of completing an adjuvant trastuzumab based regimen.

ExteNET is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of 2,840 HER2-positive eBC patients who received neratinib after neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and trastuzumab.

Patients were stratified by hormone receptor, lymph node status and sequential vs concomitant chemotherapy administration, and randomly assigned to one year of treatment with either oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

For nearly 25 years, business executive Lou Weisbach and urologist Richard J. Boxer have argued that finding the money to finance the cures for devastating diseases is not as difficult as it appears. To start finding the cures, the U.S. Department of the Treasury needs to issue some bonds—$750 billion worth. Next, you hire CEOs—one...

There is general agreement that the United States spends too much on health care, especially on pharmaceuticals.  But what we spend on drugs is not simply a function of price. If eggs double in price, people can simply cut the number of eggs they eat in half.  Simply stated, cost is the product of (price per unit times the number of units purchased). 
What did President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Edward M. Kennedy have in common? They each played a pivotal role in the passage of the National Cancer Act signed by Nixon on Dec. 23, 1971. The NCA established the National Cancer Program authorizing the initial investment in the NCI-designated Cancer Centers Program. 
When I first proposed targeting PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) as a therapeutic approach, the response I got was: “No one will ever make a drug against PCNA. It’s undruggable.” The protein lacks enzymatic activity, has a disordered region, and binds to over 200 other proteins within the cell. From a traditional drug development perspective, these characteristics made PCNA an impossible target.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login