CancerCare publishes findings from oncology provider study

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

CancerCare published a white paper highlighting perspectives from oncology providers on the importance and utility of including patient priorities in treatment decisions.

“Decision Making at the Point of Care: Voices of Oncology Providers” was developed as part of CancerCare‘s Patient Values Initiative, a multi-pronged effort aimed at reframing the national healthcare policy framework to ensure that patient engagement in treatment decision-making becomes the true standard of care.

This newly published white paper builds on the findings from the first PVI white paper, “Patient Values Initiative: The Many Voices of Value”, published in 2017. The first white paper provided findings from focus group interviews with oncology social workers and patients, highlighting the importance and value of including what’s important to patients in their treatment plans, and reinforced the need for resources to help patients articulate their quality of life priorities before treatment begins.

The latest white paper includes information from in-depth interviews with 15 oncology providers including physicians, advanced practice nurses, practice managers and health IT experts. Focused on the provider perspective, it demonstrates that while many oncology providers have a desire to learn more about their patients, both personally and clinically, there are significant barriers to ensuring that patient priorities are part of treatment decision making.

These barriers include the absence of formal procedures to capture personal information and share it among care team members, the challenges of interoperability between data sources, and the lack of electronic medical records fields that prompt the collection of patients’ quality of life priorities.

Looking to the future, over the next several months, CancerCare will conduct a quantitative survey among oncology clinicians to better understand the findings from this qualitative research.

Along with the perspectives from the patient and provider focus groups, it will inform the development and pilot testing of turnkey, low cost tools to facilitate the communication of patients’ quality of life priorities during treatment planning. The ultimate goal of the PVI is to ensure that genuine patient engagement in cancer treatment decision making becomes the standard of care, so that treatment plans reflect the true priorities, goals and needs of each patient.

CancerCare sponsors included: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, EMD Serono, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, PhRMA, Takeda Oncology.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appeared before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health to defend the HHS fiscal year 2026 budget proposal, and faced criticism from several Democratic lawmakers on what they described as a lack of transparency and scientific rigor in the agency’s recent decisions.

The full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine has devastated the Ukrainian healthcare infrastructure, disrupting cancer care, halting clinical trials, and compounding long-standing systemic challenges.  Even before the war, Ukraine’s oncology system faced major constraints: Limited access to radiotherapy equipment, outdated chemotherapy supply chains, and workforce shortages. The invasion intensified these issues—cancer hospitals were damaged, warehouses destroyed,...

Patients affected by cancer are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence-powered chatbots, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, for answers to pressing health questions. These tools, available around the clock and free from geographic or scheduling constraints, are appealing when access to medical professionals is limited by financial, language, logistical, or emotional barriers. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login