NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- Knight Cancer Institute receives record-setting $2B gift from the Knights—and self-governance within OHSU
Brian Druker returns to executive role as president of the new Knight Cancer Group - Banished from the institute he founded, separated from his lab materials, Tom Curran sues Children’s Mercy
Whistleblower lawsuit alleges wrongful firing - ACOG says it will no longer accept federal funding
- Duke Officials Silenced Med Student Who Reported Trouble in Anil Potti’s Lab
- When public service ends abruptly, do books provide solace? An escape? Perspective?
Former NIH and FDA employees tell us what they are reading in 2025 - FY25 paylines drop to 4th percentile—a historic low—as NCI braces for Trump’s FY26 budget cuts