Letter to the Editor

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Dear Editor,

We are writing to clarify a few points in your Oct. 2 article, “CMS to Trim Spending on Diagnostic Lab Tests,” as it mistakenly intertwines two issues.

On Friday, Sept. 25, 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released three separate items related to molecular diagnostics: 1) the 2015 Final Gapfill rates; 2) the Preliminary Determinations for the Calendar Year 2016 Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule; and, 3) the Medicare Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Tests Payment System Proposed Rule (as required under PAMA Section 216).

In the 2015 Gapfill rates the payment rate for Oncotype DX test for breast was reduced. Yesterday, CMS announced a technical correction to this payment rate and Genomic Health issued a release.

In the CY2016 Preliminary Determinations, CMS recommended payment rates that, if finalized, would represent drastic reductions of 30% up to 90% in payment rates for several well-established, Medicare covered advanced diagnostic laboratory tests. CMS has since announced a public expert Advisory Panel meeting on October 19th. The Coalition and member companies plan to present and we believe this an opportunity for CMS to correct the rates and issue a Final Determiantion of gapfill for 2016. The gapfill recommendation would have the effective of leaving pricing to the Medicare contractors, thus allowing MACs to continue with their current pricing. We think this is consistent with CMS policy, the August Advisory Panel recommendation, and the PAMA statute.

In the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Tests Payment System Proposed Rule CMS included a restrictive definition for Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (ADLTs) that would exclude tests based on an analysis of proteins. These advanced diagnostic tests provide physicians with specific information for managing the care of patients with complex conditions, like cancer, heart transplants, cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis. C21 plans to submit comments in the next month on the Proposed Rule.

Sincerely,
The Coalition for 21st Century Medicine

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

At the Sept. 4 meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, NCI Principal Deputy Director Douglas R. Lowy provided an overview of how NCI is weathering the maelstrom of executive orders, policy changes, and funding uncertainties that has come down on federal agencies and research institutes since Donald Trump’s inauguration in January. 
A Senate hearing that the administration hoped would be a routine check-in on the president’s 2026 MAHA-driven healthcare agenda erupted into a political firestorm as senators jumped at their first opportunity to confront HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over the chaos engulfing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In December 1971, President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act and declared a “War on Cancer.” In the past 54 years, the U.S. has invested $180 billion nominally, or approximately $322 billion when adjusted for inflation, in cancer research. This investment has paid dividends with more than 100 anticancer drugs brought to market in half a century—virtually all traceable to National Cancer Institute funding. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login