NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- DOD cancer research programs face 57% funding cut in year-long continuing resolution
Pancreatic, lung, kidney cancer research programs eliminated - What Trump’s pick of RFK Jr. means for cancer: Epidemics, HPV, stunted research
Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb expresses “deep concerns” - Kennedy announces massive cuts, centralization at HHS—NCI and FDA hit
Also this week: Columbia yields, Makary and Bhattacharya confirmed, tariffs on pharmaceuticals, and more changes impacting oncology - In The Headlines: HHS shakeup threatens a legacy of medical breakthroughs
- Alec Kimmelman named director of Perlmutter Cancer Center, quickly replacing ousted Benjamin Neel
- Jonathan Friedberg tells us how he built a cancer center in an underserved area of New York State
