NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- Franco Muggia, former head of CTEP and NYU cancer center, dies at 85
- House committee’s FY26 spending bill increases NCI funding by $48M, NIH by $99M
House joins Senate in rejecting Trump’s proposed 40% NIH cuts - Bhattacharya fields NCAB’s questions about funding, political involvement in grant review, DEI, animal testing
- Lowy: Forward-funding policy forced NCI to drastically reduce RPG awards funded for FY25, 10% of NCI staff has been lost
- Knight Cancer Institute receives record-setting $2B gift from the Knights—and self-governance within OHSU
Brian Druker returns to executive role as president of the new Knight Cancer Group - Robert A. Winn on his new vision to train cancer center leaders: “I had a big bold idea and an ‘Aha!’ moment.”