NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- Mt. Sinai forms committee to probe Epstein links to breast center founder Eva Dubin, other faculty members
- GRAIL presses on with Galleri test despite missed primary endpoint in pivotal study
Where GRAIL sees signals of benefit in the subgroups, screening experts see signs of overdiagnosis - Vinay Prasad, oncologist and Twitter star, locked in debate over precision medicine
- One result, two reactions: GRAIL’s Hall and NCI’s Castle react to negative NHS-Galleri trial outcome
- Break Through Cancer’s Tyler Jacks: “We’ve created a new operating model for collaborative cancer research.”
- GRAIL’s Megan Hall: “I think we can be confident that there is clinical benefit to implementing this technology. And I think that’s really hard to argue with.”
Mainstream epidemiologists beg to differ









