Edward Kennedy: The 20th anniversary of the National Cancer Act of 1971

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

From the office of Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts

On April 25, 1991, speaking to the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy opened the National Cancer Act’s 20th anniversary hearing with praise for advances in research, concerns about cancer disparities, and a battle cry: “The War on Cancer is far from won.”

His full statement, as well as a witness list, is available courtesty of NCI, and is reproduced below:

Statement of Sen.  Edward M. Kennedy at the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee Hearing on the 20th anniversary of the National Cancer Act 

For Immediate Release
April 25, 1991

Our hearing today marks the 20th anniversary of the National Cancer Act. That legislation, signed into law in 1971, and the amendments which followed, have led to an unprecedented explosion in the understanding of biology at the cellular level, including crucial information about the prevention of cancer and extraordinary improvements in care and treatment.

Before the National Cancer Act, there were no community clinical cancer programs, no national cancer information services for physicians and patients, and no community prevention and control programs. There were much smaller clinical trials, and fewer cancer researchers. Access to specialized care was limited. Only a few comprehensive cancer centers existed.

The expansion of basic research supported by the National Cancer Institute has shed light on cellular processes that were hardly envisioned when we introduced the National Cancer Act two decades ago. By the end of the first decade, the annual budget of the Institute had increased from under $200 million to $1 billion, or 30% of the budget of the entire NIH. Scientists supported and often trained by the Institute under the program expanded our knowledge of the genetic basis· of disease and cell processes.

This deeper understanding led to the development of an entire biotechnology industry. Human proteins were synthesized from cloned genes.

When the deadly AIDS epidemic appeared on the scene, researchers were armed with knowledge and tools that led to the rapid identification of the virus, important diagnostic tests, and useful therapies.

Clinical research and epidemiology supported by the National Cancer Institute have broadened our understanding of the causes of cancer and given us vital means to prevent it. The knowledge that a third of all cancers are caused by tobacco use has clear implications for public policy and individual behavior. More than a quarter of adults use tobacco products, and most started when they were children. Many people are alive and well today because they benefitted from this new information and stopped smoking.

The vision which inspired the National Cancer Act continues to inspire us today. But we will not realize its potential for the future unless we continue to support it.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy

Cancer treatments and cancer cures have prolonged and saved lives and given us a generation of childhood cancer survivors including my own son. Today, cure rates for those under the age of 20 are 66%; they are 75% for those under 10. Two of our witnesses today are survivors of childhood cancer and will present their experiences.

As we will also hear this morning, too many Americans still do not benefit from the knowledge and resources that have become available in the past 20 years.

Dr. Freedman, the new Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel created by the Act, will describe his work on the relationship between poverty, race and cancer mortality. We need a much greater national effort to eliminate that shameful correlation and bring the benefits of the War on Cancer to all Americans.

The vision which inspired the National Cancer Act continues to inspire us today. But we will not realize its potential for the future unless we continue to support it.

In the past decade, the budget for cancer research has declined in real dollars. Although the budget of NIH has risen 27%, the budget of the Cancer Institute has declined by 6%. The decline is even steeper, if the AIDS research funds of the Cancer Institute are not counted.

When the Act was passed in 1971 cancer was the disease that Americans most feared. Despite new health issues and concerns, it is still the number one fear today.

The War on Cancer is far from won. This is no time to lose our momentum or call a retreat.


Recent contributions

Video: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium Introduction
By Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey | July 14, 2021

Hugh Creech: A Fox Chase Family Story
By Fox Chase Cancer Center | July 13, 2021


This column features the latest posts to the Cancer History Project by our growing list of contributors

The Cancer History Project is a free, web-based, collaborative resource intended to mark the 50th anniversary of the National Cancer Act and designed to continue in perpetuity. The objective is to assemble a robust collection of historical documents and make them freely available. 

Access to the Cancer History Project is open to the public at CancerHistoryProject.com. You can also follow us on Twitter at @CancerHistProj.

Is your institution a contributor to the Cancer History Project? Eligible institutions include cancer centers, advocacy groups, professional societies, pharmaceutical companies, and key organizations in oncology. 

To apply to become a contributor, please contact admin@cancerhistoryproject.com.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Acting Director Dr. Krzysztof Ptak’s words reverberated throughout the meeting room—and the heads of several of us—during the National Cancer Institute’s Office of Cancer Centers update on the final day of the 2024 Association of American Cancer Institutes/Cancer Center Administrators Forum Annual Meeting in Chicago.
“Bridge to Bahia” exhibit.Source: Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterKaren Estrada, a survivor of acute myeloid leukemia, used visual art to communicate with her two boys while undergoing a bone marrow transplant at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center. Because Estrada’s treatment required isolation, and her young children could not yet read and write, she sought out other creative vessels to foster closeness between them.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login