FDA issues draft guidance to provide important considerations in cross labeling of oncology drugs

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

FDA has issued a Draft Guidance for comment describing the agency’s proposed recommendations for including relevant information about oncology drug labels that have been approved for use in combination drug regimens.

Cross-labeling is the inclusion of information in product labeling of two or more oncology drugs approved in a combination regimen for a specific indication. The intent is to provide information in product labeling for the drugs used in a combination regimen that are complementary and consistent and not to include all of the same information in labeling for each drug in the combination regimen.

“Oncology drug applications to the FDA often add investigational drugs to current regimens to create new combination regimens with greater efficacy or safety. Sponsors have traditionally not requested cross-labeling—making changes to the labeling of a previously approved drug that describes how to use that drug in a new regimen,” Richard Pazdur, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Oncologic Diseases in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement.

“However, recently we’ve seen an increase in the number of applications that have proposed cross-labeling for oncology drug combination regimens,” he said.

The draft guidance includes procedures for cross-labeling application submissions and considerations for selected sections in the “Full Prescribing Information” part of the drug label.

“We are issuing today’s draft guidance to serve as a starting point for discussions between the FDA and sponsors of oncology drugs, as well as the medical and academic communities, and the public on including relevant information in labeling for oncology drugs approved for use in a combination regimen,” Pazdur said. “Cross-labeling can provide clear, consistent and accessible information to guide the safe and effective use of cross-labeled drugs in an oncology treatment regimen.”

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

For nearly 25 years, business executive Lou Weisbach and urologist Richard J. Boxer have argued that finding the money to finance the cures for devastating diseases is not as difficult as it appears. To start finding the cures, the U.S. Department of the Treasury needs to issue some bonds—$750 billion worth. Next, you hire CEOs—one...

There is general agreement that the United States spends too much on health care, especially on pharmaceuticals.  But what we spend on drugs is not simply a function of price. If eggs double in price, people can simply cut the number of eggs they eat in half.  Simply stated, cost is the product of (price per unit times the number of units purchased). 
What did President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Edward M. Kennedy have in common? They each played a pivotal role in the passage of the National Cancer Act signed by Nixon on Dec. 23, 1971. The NCA established the National Cancer Program authorizing the initial investment in the NCI-designated Cancer Centers Program. 
When I first proposed targeting PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) as a therapeutic approach, the response I got was: “No one will ever make a drug against PCNA. It’s undruggable.” The protein lacks enzymatic activity, has a disordered region, and binds to over 200 other proteins within the cell. From a traditional drug development perspective, these characteristics made PCNA an impossible target.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login