UMich develops app that calculates risk of delaying cancer care during COVID-19

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A team of data scientists and cancer doctors from the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center and the U-M School of Public Health developed a free, web-based application to compare the long-term risk for a patient whose cancer treatment was postponed.

The OncCOVID app draws on national cancer data sets to help assess the risk of immediate treatment versus delayed treatment, depending on a patient’s individual characteristics, as well as on COVID’s impact on their local community.

“We also see the app providing additional reassurance to oncologists and their patients when the data show that delaying treatment will likely have little or no impact on a patient’s long-term outcome,” the project’s lead researcher, Holly Hartman, a doctoral student in biostatistics at U-M, said in a statement.

OncCOVID could also be used by health care systems resuming care and need to prioritize a backlog of patients.

“Hospitals have basically been using a three-tiered system during COVID: treat, delay a little, or delay a lot,” Daniel Spratt, associate professor of radiation oncology at Michigan Medicine and one of the senior researchers on the project, said in a statement. “Unfortunately, this tiered system is an extremely blunt instrument. Our goal was to create a resource that could be tailored both to the individual patient and to their local community.”

The app allows doctors to enter more than 45 characteristics about a patient — including their age, location, cancer type and stage, treatment plan, underlying medical conditions, and the proposed length of a delay in care. It then calculates the patient’s likely five-year survival following immediate treatment and delayed treatment.

Under the hood, the app draws on millions of records contained in the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and the National Cancer Database, combined with county-level COVID infection data from Johns Hopkins University.

Advanced features allow all of the app’s underlying statistical assumptions to be adjusted, such as the baseline mortality risk from COVID and the disease’s infection rate. In the future, the researchers plan to use the same data model to start looking at the effects that treatment delays due to the coronavirus pandemic may have on cancer mortality nationally, Hartman said.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

On Feb. 19, GRAIL Inc. announced that its pivotal NHS-Galleri trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of reduction in advanced stage cancers. The media and the market reacted as one would expect: GRAIL’s stock price halved the day after the announcement and at least three law firms said that they are conducting investigations in preparation for filing investor suits.
If you listen to GRAIL executives discuss the results of the long-awaited trial of the company’s multicancer detection test, you might be led to conclude that the company’s pivotal NHS-Galleri study had an overwhelmingly positive result.
Undeterred by the negative topline result of its pivotal trial of Galleri, a multicancer detection test, the test’s sponsor, GRAIL, said it’s forging ahead with its plan to get FDA approval and reimbursement from CMS and private insurers.
Philip E. Castle, director of the NCI Division of Cancer Prevention, said he was disappointed to hear that GRAIL’s NHS-Galleri trial did not meet its primary endpoint of reduction in late-stage cancers.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login