publication date: Jun. 7, 2019

Guest Editorial

Big Data for outcomes and clinical research: major advance or improvement needed

By Roy B. Jones, Amar Chahal, Dianne Reeves, Gregory H. Jones, Charles S. Martinez

Creation of Big Data repositories is now emphasized at virtually all research institutions and the NIH, but the number of publications describing patient outcomes from these sources appears modest.1 Why is this so; what factors limit what should be a hugely productive resource, and how can we improve the impact of this use of Big Data? Why does this issue require greater physician engagement and understanding to solve? The integration of clinical, laboratory, and financial data is required to describe disease and treatment outcomes as well as treatment value.

 

Data standards

Key to understanding these issues are the concepts of information, structured data, and data standards. Computers must use a uniform data structure to analyze any data set, and making this structure compatible across multiple institutions is required to merge their data into a single database (Figure 1). In contrast, most medical practice places major emphasis on collection of information which routinely lacks structure; for example, clinical notes.

Continue reading Big Data for outcomes and clinical research: major advance or improvement needed
To access this members-only content, please log in.
Institutional subscribers, please log in with your IP.
If you're not a subscriber why not join today?
To gain access to the members only content click here to subscribe.
You will be given immediate access to premium content on the site.
Click here to join.

Copyright (c) 2019 The Cancer Letter Inc.

Institution

Data Structure

Tumor Response

Data Standard

Tumor Response

A

Response, complete

CR_clinical