publication date: May. 9, 2014
Oregon Center Launching $1 Billion Program To Identify Lethal Cancers Before They Kill
Brian Druker has some awesome jobs to fill.
As many as 30 scientists and their teams will get to focus on cancer research without having to worry about applying for grants.
“It’s about bringing 20 to 30 people together, giving them sufficient funding—almost like [Howard Hughes Medical Institute] level funding,” Druker said to The Cancer Letter. “If you have 20 to 30 people who are focused on science, working as a team to solve a problem, judged on progress toward the goal, as opposed to how many grants and publications do you have, we think we can make a more rapid contribution in this area.
|CMS Advisors Express Low Confidence In Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer|
An advisory panel for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expressed low confidence in low-dose computed tomography as a method for screening for lung cancer in the Medicare population.
Evidence is inadequate to ensure that benefits of the procedure would outweigh harms, the Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee said at the hearing April 30.
|Bach: LCA Center Certification Untrustworthy; CISNET Models Don’t Match|
When it appeared that CT screening for lung cancer was a shoo-in for Medicare coverage, the Lung Cancer Alliance, an advocacy group, started to certify “screening centers of excellence.”
Centers all over the country received this designation from LCA and were listed on the group’s website.
However, as he prepared for a recent Medicare advisory committee meeting, Peter Bach, a pulmonologist and health systems researcher at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, checked the list of LCA-certified centers.
|Steven Woolf: Why CMS Should Not Cover LDCT|
National coverage for low-dose computed tomography may result in more harm than benefit to the Medicare population at this time, said Steven Woolf, a member of the Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee.
Speaking at the April 30 MEDCAC hearing, Woolf said coverage would run into many implementation challenges and adherence problems—it would be unlikely that all practices would observe the strict criteria set by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Lung Screening Trial, he said.
|Growth of the Cost of Drugs Slows to 5.4 Percent per Year; 21 Therapies Launched in 2 Years|
The growth of global spending on oncology medicines has slowed over the past five years, according to a report by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.
Spending on cancer drugs, including those used for supportive care, increased at a compound annual growth rate of 5.4 percent during the past five years, reaching $91 billion in 2013, compared with 14.2 percent from 2003 to 2008.
|Women’s Health Initiative Trial Produced $37.1 Billion in Returns|
The overall economic return from the Women’s Health Initiative estrogen plus progestin trial indicates that the changes in practice it produced provided a net economic return of $37.1 billion over 10 years.
|FDA Oncology Unit Fastest in Approvals Despite Having Highest Workload|
A study by a conservative think tank found large differences in performance of the FDA divisions, with oncology demonstrating the agency’s fastest time from application submission to approval.
Paradoxically, the Manhattan Institute found that the oncology division’s staff members had the agency’s highest workload—measured in INDs per staff member at the division.
David Cole named president of The Medical University of South Carolina
Peter Bach’s account of his wife’s death from breast cancer
MD Anderson honors 16 junior faculty members
US Oncology and Community Oncology Alliance speak to Congress
Athena Breast Health Network adopts ASCO’s HL7 Guide for EMRs
Eli Lilly & Co. sign agreement with Prasco Laboratories
Johns Hopkins receives $10 million from Under Armour
Melanoma Research Alliance and L’Oreal Paris begin campaign
Kristin Darby named chief information officer of Cancer Treatment Centers of America